@ENKELI Good seeing we are back on line about this. For apart of your assertion that we need laws for otherwise society would disintegrate, we are again seeing eye to eye on things. (i hope)
i know that making laws important have been the lies peddling humanity for thousands of years already, in Jesus day we see how even God's holy law was made to do that, the law lovers crucifying ETERNAL GOOD LIFE instead of GROWING IN HIM. For laws forbid what LAW MAKERS deem to be wrong, or is beneficial to be seen as wrong, not what is really wrong. The Word of God taught me to understand this about law making through my life with Jesus.
Just check on this socially if you doubt me about this, but i assert that since the 1970s we have had countless so called humane laws made to protect, give rights to, or preserve life, be it human, or otherwise, as well as laws governing God's good created things, like making herbs/plants/things illegal to use.
Yet please ask yourself where has this happened without the freedoms of people being taken from us as people? Where have there not been build more jails to incarnate the law breakers? Where has a law been made where not more monies were made out fining wrong doing? Where are there no families destroyed having loved ones locked up, often for years on end, for non violent offences. While the offence the law was made about is still going strong if not strong than ever?
(For i dare say in the 1970s we were far more law abiding than we are in 2025, even though thousands of laws have come into being so called giving us protection.)
This is because as someone who studied social science i know law makers lie about almost everything. Where the real purpose of the law has often nothing to do with what they say the law is needed for.
As i know it is with these dog laws they are making now. For i know that those who profit of such laws are actively labelling those who love dogs, and then breed them, to be bad people, while those who want to cull dogs so they can monetise dogs, to be good for the dogs. Without any truth or evidence. Merely using the wrongs towards dogs in our society to get what they want.
For of course, like their father satan, they deceive us with their talk, but if you check the real law makers motives, and who are really pushing for these kind of laws behind the scenes, and why, it becomes very obvious in no time.
For ask yourself sister who will benefit when those so called backyard growers they got you to you hate so much. Inventing labels never used before, so you would hate dog lovers like me without further investigation or knowledge about the matter? Could it be those who make a HUGE profit selling dogs at astronomical prices are pushing these laws? Could it be so only a few people, the very rich, can own dogs after these laws have come in? So that no else can have dogs any more, as the World Economic Forum is openly pushing for, and Australia is a signature to? Has it to do with getting rid of dogs, an the cheap availability of dogs, rather than protecting them? For i can breed my puppies for cost to someone else, but registered breeders have massive overheads and must charge huge dollars for the breeds they breed to come even or be able to make a living out of it. (This is why registered dogs breeders hate people like me, for i impede on their livelihood, not anything to do with the well being of my dogs or puppies whatsoever.)
To proof how those ruling us do this, i'll relate where they acted this way in the past and show you were how such laws deceived us.
i'll give you a real life example in my state of WA.
Years ago, suddenly the police through the media kept on reporting on accidents that were alcohol related. Of course many people responded to this increase and called for new laws and police powers to stop these sad events from happening.
Predictably soon the police announced the were going to do a year pilot program targetting drinking driving. Where for 1 year they were given the power to stop motorist and breathalyse them. Of course the media promoted this as wonderful. And all those people pushing for new laws sighed a breath of relief. In the mean time the police came out with the so called stats on road accidents numbers that where alcohol related. They boldly claimed on TV that 50 percent of the road deaths were alcohol related. This was all said and taught by the main media at the time during the year the pilot program was running. So that us the concerned people could rest assured the roads would be much safer when the police has these kind of powers.
However at the end of the 1 year the their stats came out. And although tens of thousands of people had been stopped and tested in the STATE over that 12 month period. More police had been employed. And the police doing this had been constantly warned about on TV and radio as happening to those who drank and drove the car. Only a miniscule percent was court drunk driving, a few zeroes after the decibel even. And what was even more tale telling of their lies, though of course they said NOTHING about that, was that were no less deaths on the roads that year. (i seem to remember studying this at the time it was even higher than the year before.)
Yet the media branded the police pilot program a great success, and assured us the roads were much saver now than before. All the people who wanted the law celebrated when the government promptly did what they had schemed all along to making new laws. And we lost freedoms, and the powers that be got more power over us, as well as more money through the MASSIVE fines laid on people for such offences. And they brand anyone challenging their ways as someone who does not care about the good of society, a conspiracy theorist, and will even go as far as brand you a terrorist, if you resist the powers that control like this.
For today we have not only alcohol laws but also on any drug usage the police can search ANYONE they want, at any time. Where no evidence of a crime is needed. Yet road safety, used to get those laws, has not improved whatsoever, for the real issues why people drive the car of their faces on drugs or alcohol have NOT ever been addressed or even looked into like usual. Yet both government, police, and the justice system, have had a field day when it comes to social/legal powers and monitory/status returns.
This is why i was triggered by you calling me a Sunday Christian defending my faith saying this to you. All because i told you i love to breed my dogs so therefore i am a bad person who does not do the right thing. You think like this because the media and the organisations behind this thinking made sure you think like that about us 'backyard' growers. And so we are divided on the issue through law making.
Yet the truth about dogs is, that it have always been the dog lovers who did the RIGHT thing with dogs, and are the TRUE reason we have (so many kind of) dogs. Never are it money makers wanting to make money on them who cause good things to happen for dogs. As a matter of fact usually money is behind the abuse of animals, for the dollars rules, not love for the animal they breed. (Just go to one of Coles or Woollies RSPCA approved registered Chicken farms, and then come and visit us in our backyard, they smear as being no good, and you will see the difference.
i hope i did not again trigger you saying all this, but like you i'm with God on the need for laws. For then only one law ought to be kept at - and that is Love God, love God who is all that is true and good, love God who is all Life and shapes all Created existence. For to love God with all you heart is the same as loving your neighbour, or any other form of life, beside your own life, as you ought to love yourself.
If we would live according to this awesome law no other laws will ever be needed again, and true freedom can be had. For then instead of making more laws to benefit WRONG ruling, we would know that we love LIFE more getting rid of laws replace them with love so GOOD for ALL LIFE will ALWAYS be around.
Have a blessed day.
